New Delhi | Observing that Justice Yashwant Varma's conduct does not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday posed sharp questions to the judge seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row.
The top court asked Justice Varma why did he appear before the in-house inquiry committee and not challenge it then and there.
It told Justice Varma that he should have come earlier to the apex court against the in-house inquiry panel's report.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih said if the Chief Justice of India has material to believe that there is misconduct by a judge then he can inform the president and the prime minister.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Justice Varma, submitted that the in-house inquiry panel's recommendation for his removal is unconstitutional.
Sibal told the court that recommendation of proceedings for removal in this manner would set a dangerous precedent.
The hearing is underway.
You may also like
India's GCC hiring surge shows 48 pc plan to expand workforce in FY26
Tom Kerridge hits back as Michelin restaurant customer moans 'beef from Costco is better'
Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland apps down as customers unable to access cash
Lioness star Hannah Hampton's reason for turning down eye surgery amid condition
Sky Sports Golf star wanted 'ground to eat her up' after awkward Dustin Johnson moment