The late Queen would have been "horrified" by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's criticism of , a royal expert has said. The Duchess of Sussex was appointed as vice-president of the Commonwealth Trust in March 2019, while her husband was president, with the hope the couple would breathe fresh life into the voluntary association of 56 nations - most of which were once part of the British Empire.
At the time, Meghan even claimed her work would "highlight the trust's partnerships with young people across , and in particular its work supporting women and girls". But the couple left the trust when they stepped down as working royals in 2020 - and when they aired their Netflix docuseries in December 2022, the pair hired experts .
The Daily Mail's diary editor Richard Eden said: "It's almost lucky that isn't alive to see this because the Commonwealth was so central to her and bringing people together. It's a voluntary organisation whereas [in the documentary], it's dismissed as this colonial body used for Britain to extract money and resources from the rest of the world. She would have been horrified."
In the documentary, academic Afua Hirsch called "Empire 2.0" while author Kehinde Andrews claimed "nothing has changed" from the UK's colonial past, apart from the Royal Family's "better PR".
THIS LIVE BLOG IS NOW CLOSED. ALL UPDATES CAN BE OR BELOW.
You may also like
Swwapnil Joshi: I enjoy staying busy with back-to-back projects
BREAKING: UK inflation falls as petrol prices dip - what it means for your money
UK inflation dips to 2.6% in March but Britons warned 'calm before storm'
UK mobile phone provider to switch off service after O2, Vodafone and EE
New British war film out on Friday is best since Dunkirk